I'm in the mood for a little bit of a rant today after reading an email sent to me by a friend. Has anyone read the guidelines on what is considered sexual offense recently? Did anyone know that the guidelines are different between a male and a female here in Michigan? I thought justice was supposed to be blind.
When it comes to a male's guidelines, the act must include unwanted sexual contact (not any kind of contact, must be sexual), forced penetration, or unintended sodomy.
When it comes to a female, it is any act or gesture, verbal or physical, that can be determined by the female as sexual harassment. So basically meaning that if some woman really wanted to sue someone, all that person had to do was wink at the chick, and the chick could press charges or file suit? What the hell?
Please do not tell me that I don't understand how hard it is to be a female, so feminazis and femdombots out there, spare it, I don't care about your little rants. Yes the income thing needs to be solved, but besides that really where is the discrimination against women? Find me some rule out their for becoming a doctor, or a lawyer, or even a high paid politician, that secludes women? You won't find any, but because their is this attitude in the powers to be that men are just walking rapists or something, you're going to get this.
Look at the Duke case for an example. The tides are turning and finally people are realizing that these guys are innocent. My god, any sane thinker would've envisioned that, when the idiot refused to release evidence linking these guys to any form of rape, but all the woman had to do was point a finger, and she got a fricken indictment. Plus, thanks to the media polluting the jury pool with every feminazi out their, as well as Jesse Jackson, who apparently someone named as the messiah of black people all over the world, and because apparently he must have been their for the whole scenario of this woman being raped, saying that she's telling the truth simply on the fact that she's a woman and she's black.
So now the justice system isn't even considering using evidence anymore? I mean have we decided to take our whole complicated system of judiciaries and change their job to re-writing laws (which is another topic for another day) and replaced the method and the purpose of them proving or disproving innocence with a method of judging the book by it's cover? I mean what has happened to our country?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
We get a lot of public service type commercials on the Armed Forces Network. One is about sexual harrassment & it actually says that it doesn't matter what your intent was . . . it is how it is perceived that matters.
In other words, even if you are innocent in your intent, you are guilty if someone misinterprets your intent.
How stupid is that?
---not really anonymous, but can't seem to get it accepted another way - - - mili
Post a Comment